अयोध्या मामला : सुबह 10:30 बजे फैसला सुनाएगी सुप्रीम कोर्ट, जाने क्या होगा…

Spread this

सुप्रीम कोर्ट के चीफ जस्टिस रंजन गोगोई ने बताया है कि अयोध्या मामले पर पूरी सुनवाई के बाद अब कोर्ट 9 नवंबर 2019 को सुबह 10:30 बजे अपना फैसला सुनाएगी।

अभी अभी भारत के प्रधानमंत्री नरेन्द्र मोदी ने भी सोशल मीडिया पर देश के नाम संदेश भेजा है जिसमे कहा है कि “अयोध्या मामले पर सुप्रीम कोर्ट का जो भी फैसला आएगा उसमे किसी भी पक्ष का हार या जीत नही होगा। देश वाशियो से अपील है की हम सब की यह प्राथमिकता रहे कि ये फैसला भारत की शांति, एकता और सद्भावना की महान परंपरा को बल दे।”

उत्तरप्रदेश के मुख्यमंत्री योगी आदित्यनाथ ने भी फैसले के पहले से सुरक्षा व्यवस्था चाक चौबंद कर रखा है। हालांकि मामले को देखते हुए पूरे देश मे ही हाई अलर्ट जारी कर दिया गया है।

 

सुबह 10:30 बजे पूरा देश या यूं कहें तो पूरा विश्व भारत की सुप्रीम कोर्ट के तरफ ही नजरे किये रहेंगी। 17 नवंबर को ही रंजन गोगोई सेवानिवृत्त हो रहे है ऐसा अनुमान लगाया जा रहा है कि जल्द ही कुछ बड़े मामलों में फैसला आ जाय जाए।

Spread this

8 thoughts on “अयोध्या मामला : सुबह 10:30 बजे फैसला सुनाएगी सुप्रीम कोर्ट, जाने क्या होगा…

  1. Subject – Chaiwala’s scam of the Billenium

    Context

    This is proof that Hindoosthan has to be partitioned.dindooohindoo

    The Indian SC gives the Babri Masjid to the Hindoos

    Archaeo-legal evidence

    In matters of archaeo-legal evidence of history,the cumulative patterns of archaeological evidence over 1000s of years are to be used – on matters of theological coordinates.

    For example,there is no Rama or Vishnu in the Rig Veda – which is a North Indian script (with anti-south indian slant – which makes the absence all the more stark)- and this disaster stretches right upto the opus and treasure troves of Ashoka.

    Even assuming that Rama was a dark skinned limpet (as per the Ramayana) and a Dasyus – condemned into oblivion by the Rig veda – and Ashoka being of Saka
    origin,put Rama into the prolapsed uterus dustbin – there has to be a trail of evidence pointing to the Rama birth place.

    Nil ASI Pattern of evidence

    There is no authenticated or carbon dated evidence on a papyrus,tablets,leaves,goat skin, cow skin, pottery,idol,wall carving,painting which even obliquely refers to any Rama birth site – except the gay love rantings of Tulsidas – which even Tulsidas admits, are not based on any revelations by Rama or Vishnu or Vrinda or Kaushalya

    It is based on the beliefs and perceptions of Hindoos who are ignoramuses,imbeciles and heathens.

    I challenge the ASI to show a Phallic worship object dated to the 5 century BC – as there is none.All the tales of Shiva are from Africa and West Asia –
    wherein phallic symbols and kamasutra engravings are carbon dated to 2500 BC.

    ASI Strategy and Hindoo seers

    Then comes in the ASI – which does controlled excavations.If Rama was an icon even in North or Central India – I can bet that the ASI has not uncovered a
    single Rama Temple dated to the 1st and 5th century AD.

    Madhavcharya called Ade Shankara a son of a prostitute and a liar and cheat and a quasi Buddhist.There is not 1 line in the magnum opus of Ade Shankara or
    Madhavacharya on any Rama birth place or a grandiose temple of learning at his birthplace.

    The truth is that if ASI digs in December 2020,in Ayodhya, it will find several sites which will have the name of Rama on the walls and murals – but it purposely maintained the status quo – to bias the judiciary.

    Even from the 5th to the 15 century, I can bet that that the ASI does not have a single site or artefact or cuneiform tablet or scripture or treatise –
    which even remotely hints of a TEMPLE EVER AT A RAMA BIRTH SITE – forget the site of the birth of the impotent gay pansy Rama

    Granth and Mahabharata

    Even the Mahabaharata does not have 1 word on a grand TEMPLE ON THE SITE OF RAMA’S BIRTH PLACE – EVER.Not 1 word.

    Sikhs believe that Nanak of the Bedi clan,was lineaged from Lav and Kush.There is not 1 line in the Granth on a grand temple on the site of Rama’s birth

    It proves the following :

    The Brahmin Formula

    The Brahmins forged and burnt the Granth Sahib,forged the Bachetar Natak introduced porn in the Granth Sahib,introduced Kali and Durga worship in the
    Sikh scriptures ,killed- beheaded and poisoned the so called Sikh Prophets and also placed idols of Krishna and others in the Golden Temple.

    Cogito

    As an aside,why did the Hindoos not record in history the existence of a grand Temple for Rama,per se,let alone his birth place.

    Simple !

    Rama’s mother had sex with a Horse and also had sex with 11 Brahmins as her husband was an impotent pansy
    Kaushalya is quoted in the Ramayana, as saying that her husband and Rama ONLY GAVE HER SORROW AND NO SATISFACTION AND RESPECT (no sexual satisfaction for Kaushalya after the advent of Kaikeyi – and this is also stated in the Ramayana)

    The above explains why Brahmins LOVE Rama.These people inserted verses and forgeries in the Gita and Mahabharata and the Vedas.

  2. Subject – How can a Mosque be renounced by virtue of perceptual faith to Idolators &a Heathen God

    Context

    This is proof that Hindoosthan has to be partitioned.dindooohindoo

    The Indian Judiciary,in another case, has hanged a community based on public perception. In other words,it has deprived a Title owner of its Title – on the grounds of perceptual faith,and denied the title holder the right to make a renunciation.

    History ?

    It is “neither History nor an Interpretation or Perception of History”.It is a Distortion of History.What is Public perception in a nation where idols drink milk & rum &500 million people are swayed by a Rs 15,00,00 promise.During the time of Babar,the population of Hindoosthan might have been 15 million &that of Ayodhya,around 350000.

    How can the “Muslims” of Hindooosthan – give a Mosque to the Hindoo Idolator ?

    ASI

    ASI Reports mean nothing as the temple underneath, may have a stupa underneath (as it was a controlled excavation) – &there was no monolithic Hindoo faith in that time – just menial,savage,heathen pagan &satan worshippers.The ASI report has no proof that there was a Rama temple or that it was the birthplace of Rama or that it was a temple of Vishnu.

    ASI has done limited excavations in Ayodhya &I can bet that if it is done – there will be several Ram Janamsthans – set up by Brahmins to milk hapless &heathen Hindoos – just like the Bible of Barnabus (appeared magically) &blew up the Jesus crucifixion &resurrection gospel.

    The 5 acre pitt(y)ance

    Will the Hindoos allow the Muslims to make a “Shaheed Babri Masjid” at the 5 acre spot ? Babar &the Mughals civilised the Hindoos ! Read this verse from the Ramayana – when Ravana describes Seeta !

    http://www.valmikiramayan.net/aranya/sarga46/aranya_46_frame.htm

    “Your hips are beamy, thighs burly akin to elephant’s trunks, &these two breasts of yours that are ornamented with best jewellery are rotund, rubbing &bumping each other, &they are swinging up &up, their nipples are brawny &jutting out, &they are smoothish like palm-fruits, thus they are covetable for they are beautiful.

    “Oh, allurer, your smile is alluring, teeth are alluring, &your eyes allure, oh, beauty, your waist is palmful, your hair velvety, your breasts are jostling, &you rob my soul as a spate robs riverbank. [3-46-21, 22a]

    It will be obvious to the AG of the Indian Government, that Seeta was topless &wearing a loincloth. THE MUGHALS TAUGHT THE HINDOOS TO WEAR CLOTHES &DO PROPER ABLUTIONS !

    Besides the above,how can a “Muslim” &even an “Indian Muslim” renounce a mosque to Rama ? Who is Mr Tulsidas ? Was the Quran revealed to the Prophet or to Ghazali ? Tulsidas was a hallucinated crank high on coke – in love with Rama who spent 12 years in a jungle with only apes &some humans

    As per the Valmiki Ramayana – Sita called Rama an impotent pansy &Rama is quoted in the Ramayana – as stating to Seeta – that she should prostitute herself to apes,demons &Rama’s own brother ! Can such a man be a Prophet or a God or Imam ?

    Seeta calls Rama an Impotent Pansy

    Book II : Ayodhya Kanda – Book Of Ayodhya Chapter[30

    “What my father, the king of Mithila belonging to the country of Videha, think of himself having got as so-in-law you, a woman having the form of a man?”

    Rama tells Seeta to prostitute herself

    Chapter [115

    “O Seetha! That is why, I am permitting you now. Go wherever you like. All these ten directions are open to you, my dear lady! There is no work to be done to me, by you.”

    “O gracious lady! Therefore, this has been spoken by me today, with a resolved mind. Set you mind on Lakshmana or Bharata, as per your ease.”

    “O Seetha! Otherwise, set your mind either on Shatrughna or on Sugreeva or on Vibhishana the demon; or according to your own comfort.”

    Can a Mosque be renounced in favour of such a person ?

    Partition = only solution the Rama Temple will never be completed

  3. Hi there, simply changed into alert to your blog through Google, and found that it’s really informative. I am gonna watch out for brussels. I will appreciate in case you continue this in future. Numerous other people will be benefited out of your writing. Cheers!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Translate »